Federal Register | Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Hospital …

Comment Period: The comment period, for the technical corrections set forth in this correcting document, is extended to 5 p.m. E.S.T. on September 16, 2013.

Erick Chuang, (410) 786-1816.

In FR. Doc. 2013-16555 of July 19, 2013 (78 FR 43534), (hereinafter referred to as the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule), there were a number of technical errors that are discussed in the Summary of Errors, and further identified and corrected in the Correction of Errors sections. The CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule proposes to revise the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for calendar year (CY) 2014 to implement applicable statutory requirements and policy changes. In the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we described proposed changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and ASC payment system.

Since the publication of the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we have reviewed the data on which the CY 2014 proposed OPPS and ASC payment rates were developed, and discovered that in the process of applying our established and proposed methodologies to develop the CY 2014 proposed OPPS and ASC payment rates, specific cost estimation errors occurred in the OPPS modeling process. The errors resulting from the cost modeling used to develop the CY 2014 proposed OPPS payment rates are isolated to a few specific ambulatory payment classifications (APCs). However, because the OPPS is a budget neutral payment system, there is a resulting impact on other proposed OPPS payment rates. The technical errors corrected in this document do not implicate any of the proposed methodologies or other proposed policies described in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule.

In the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we proposed to continue our policy of basing the ASC relative payment weights and rates on APC groups and the OPPS relative payment weights, and because this document corrects technical errors related to cost modeling conducted in developing the proposed OPPS relative payment weights, the proposed CY 2014 ASC relative payment weights are being corrected. As we noted previously, the technical errors corrected in this document do not implicate any of the proposed methodologies or other proposed policies described in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule.

We are extending the comment period, for the limited purpose of providing the public an opportunity to comment on the technical corrections noted in this correcting document, for an additional 10 days, to September 16, 2013.

A. Outpatient Prospective Payment System Payment System Corrections

In the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we announced a number of proposals that would affect the CY 2014 OPPS. One of the policy changes we proposed was a reconfiguration of how the visit APCs would be coded and paid in the CY 2014 OPPS (78 FR 43614). Separately, for the CY 2014 OPPS, we proposed to package certain clinical diagnostic laboratory tests that were previously paid to hospitals at the Clinical Lab Fee Schedule payment rates (78 FR 43572). Following the standard methodology we use to develop OPPS payment rates described in the proposed rule, we modeled the relevant data to develop the proposed new visit APCs (78 FR 43615 through 43616). Subsequently, in reviewing how the cost modeling occurred in developing the proposed new visit APCs contained in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we discovered that a programming error caused the packaged costs associated with the CY 2014 clinical diagnostic laboratory test packaging proposal to be excluded. To accurately reflect the interaction of these two CY 2014 OPPS proposed policies, in this correcting document, we have fixed this programming issue and developed proposed APC relative payment weights for the following proposed new visit APCs: 0634 (Hospital Clinic Visits), 0635 (Type A Emergency Visits), and 0636 (Type B Emergency Visits).

As a result of the proposed coding and payment changes to the visit APCs, we proposed a new composite APC 8009 (Extended Assessment and Management Composite) for the CY 2014 OPPS (78 FR 43562 through 43563). Additionally, we proposed to expand the line item trim to also include clinical diagnostic laboratory tests that did not receive payment in the claims year in our cost modeling process for the CY 2014 OPPS (78 FR 43551). Upon reviewing the cost data used to develop this proposed APC, we discovered that the line item trim was not correctly applied to the proposed new composite APC 8009 in our cost modeling process. In this correcting document, we are correctly applying the proposed line item trim for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests that did not receive payment in the claims year in estimating the costs associated with proposed new composite APC 8009.

For the CY 2014 OPPS, we proposed to recognize the CPT codes for stereotactic radiosurgery (77371, 77372, and 77373) while no longer recognizing the G-codes that had previously been used to identify certain stereotactic radiosurgery services (G0173, G0251, G0339, and G0340) (78 FR 43593 through 43594). However, following our established and proposed methodologies, in developing the estimated costs on which the proposed CY 2014 OPPS payment rates were based, we neglected to include the data from those G-codes in calculating the proposed geometric mean costs of the stereotactic radiosurgery APCs. In this correcting document, we have included the claims data from those G-codes in calculating the proposed APC relative payment weights for the proposed stereotactic radiosurgery APCs 0066 (Level I Stereotactic Radiosurgery) and 0067 (Level II Stereotactic Radiosurgery).

In our review, we also discovered an error with the calculation of the proposed CY 2014 budget neutrality adjustment factor used to calculate the proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital payment adjustment. As noted in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, the proposed CY 2014 budget neutrality adjustment factor is calculated by comparing the estimated total CY 2014 OPPS payments including the proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital payment adjustment to the estimated total CY 2014 OPPS payments using the CY 2013 cancer hospital payment adjustment. We miscalculated the proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital adjustment payment weights for purposes of this comparison when converting estimated CY 2014 cancer hospital adjustment payments into payment weights. Correctly developing this proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital adjustment payment weight for this comparison requires a corresponding correction to the proposed budget neutrality adjustment associated with the proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital payment adjustment from the 1.0001 published in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (78 FR 43577) to 1.0003. As a result of the correction to the proposed CY 2014 cancer hospital payment adjustment for budget neutrality, the proposed CY 2014 OPPS conversion factor is also corrected in this correcting document from the $72.728 published in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (78 FR 43578) to $72.743.

While the technical corrections described previously are generally isolated to specific APCs, because the OPPS is a budget neutral payment system, we recalculated the proposed CY 2014 budget neutral weight scaler. As discussed in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, the budget neutral weight scaler is calculated by comparing aggregate CY 2013 OPPS payment weight to unscaled aggregate CY 2014 OPPS payment weight. As a result of the technical corrections previously described, several of the estimated costs on which the proposed unscaled CY 2014 payment weights are developed require correlating corrections. Those corrections to the proposed payment weights then affect the proposed aggregate unscaled CY 2014 OPPS payment weights which are then used to determine the appropriate proposed budget neutrality adjustment. Using the corrected proposed unscaled relative payment weights, the proposed CY 2014 budget neutrality weight scaler changes from 1.2143 as originally proposed (see 78 FR 43576) to 1.3315.

As previously stated, the technical corrections discussed previously result in corrections to the proposed OPPS relative payment weights and the proposed CY 2014 OPPS conversion factor, both of which are used to calculate the proposed CY 2014 OPPS payment rates. Outlier payments are made based on the relationship between APC payments and estimated cost, so corrections to the proposed APC payment rates would affect the appropriate fixed-dollar outlier threshold applied to achieve the estimated OPPS outlier spending target of 1.0 percent (78 FR 43583 through 43584). Using the corrected proposed CY 2014 OPPS relative payment weights and conversion factor, the proposed CY 2014 OPPS/ASC fixed-dollar outlier threshold changes from $2,775, as originally proposed (see 78 FR 43583 through 43584), to $2,900.

We are also making technical corrections to Table 39—Estimated Impact of the Proposed CY 2014 Changes for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payments System (78 FR 43692) and the correlating preamble language (78 FR 43689). As noted previously, because the OPPS is a budget neutral system, and while the impact of the technical corrections discussed previously on APC payment is generally concentrated within specific APCs that were modified for significant proposals in CY 2014, there are resulting technical corrections necessary with respect to all other proposed CY 2014 OPPS payment weights and rates within the system. The corrections to this impact table (78 FR 43692) relative to the impact table originally published in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule correspond to the case mix of services furnished by providers and how they are affected by the technical corrections in this document.

B. Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System Corrections

ASC payment rates are based on the OPPS relative payment weights for the majority of items and services that are provided at ASCs. Therefore, corrections to the proposed CY 2014 OPPS relative payment weights also have an impact on the proposed CY 2014 ASC relative payment weights and ASC payment rates. Due to the corrections made to the proposed CY 2014 OPPS relative payment weights, we recalculated the proposed CY 2014 budget neutral ASC weight scaler (see 78 FR 43640 and 43641). Using the proposed corrected scaled CY 2014 OPPS relative weights, the proposed CY 2014 budget neutrality ASC weight scaler changes from 0.8961, as originally proposed (78 FR 43641), to 0.9102. The corrected proposed CY 2014 ASC relative payment weights and the proposed CY 2014 budget neutral ASC weight scaler have no impact on the proposed CY 2014 ASC conversion factor.

C. Summary of Errors in and Corrections to Addenda Posted on the CMS Web Site

1. Outpatient Prospective Payment System Payment System Addenda

We are making several minor technical corrections to the OPPS addenda. We are correcting the OPPS status indicators for CPT codes 93619, 93620 and 93650 to “J1” to accurately reflect our CY 2014 proposal to establish APC 0085 as a comprehensive APC. We are also correcting the displayed assignment of CPT code 33233 to APC 0106 to fix a discrepancy between our addenda and the cost statistics files we make available to the public. As a result of these corrections, Addendum A, B, C, and M will also be corrected.

To view the corrected proposed CY 2014 OPPS payment rates that result from the corrected geometric mean costs and other technical corrections, we refer readers to the Addenda and supporting files that are posted on the CMS Web site at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalOutpatientPPS/index.html. Select “CMS-1601-CN” from the list of regulations. All corrected Addenda for this correcting document are contained in the zipped folder entitled, “2014 OPPS NPRM Addenda” at the bottom of the page for CMS-1601-CN. The corrected CY 2014 OPPS file of geometric mean costs is found under supporting documentation for CMS-1601-CN.

2. Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System Addenda

To view the corrected proposed CY 2014 ASC payment rates that result from the corrected proposed CY 2014 ASC relative payment weights, see the ASC addenda that are posted on the CMS Web site at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ASCPayment/ASC-Regulations-and-Notices.html. Select “CMS-1601-CN” from the list of regulations. All corrected ASC addenda for this correcting document are contained in the zipped folder entitled “Addendum AA, BB, DD1, DD2, and EE” at the bottom of the page for CMS-1601-CN.

We ordinarily permit a 60-day comment period on notices of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, as provided in section 1871(b)(1) of the Act. However, this period may be shortened, as provided under section 1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act, when the Secretary finds good cause that a 60-day comment period would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest and incorporates a statement of the finding and its reasons in the rule issued. Because the corrections in this document do not make any changes to the substantive policies proposed in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, but merely correct underlying data errors that impact certain components of the payment systems to conform to the proposed policies clearly intended in the preamble of the proposed rule, this correcting document does not constitute agency rulemaking, and therefore the 60-day comment period does not apply. In addition, we believe it is important for the public to have the corrected information as soon as possible and find no reason to delay dissemination of it.

For the reasons stated previously, we find it both unnecessary and contrary to the public interest to undertake further notice and comment procedures with respect to this correcting document.

1. On page 43562, third column, first full paragraph, in line 4, the figure “$1,357” is corrected to read “$1,348”.

2. On page 43571,

a. Table 8—CY 2013 Separate Payment Versus CY 2014 Proposed Packaged Payment For MPI, the table is corrected to read as follows:

b. First column, first paragraph, in line 4, the figure “14” is corrected to read “12”.

3. On page 43576, third column, second full paragraph, in line 17, the figure “1.2143” is corrected to read “1.3315”.

4. On page 43577, third column, third full paragraph, in line 27, the figure “1.0001” is corrected to read “1.0003”.

5. On page 43578,

a. First column,

(1) First full paragraph,

(a) In line 13, the figure “1.0001” is corrected to read “1.0003”.

(b) In line 18, the figure “$72.728” is corrected to read “$72.743”.

(2) Second full paragraph, in line 34, the figure “$71.273” is corrected to read“$71.288”.

b. Second column, first paragraph,

(1) In line 3, the figure “$72.728” is corrected to read “$72.743”.

(2) In line 16, the figure “$71.273” is corrected to read “$71.288”.

6. On page 43584,

a. First column, under the heading “2. Proposed Outlier Calculation”, second paragraph, in line 11, the figure “$2,775” is corrected to read “$2,900”.

b. Third column, first partial paragraph,

(1) In line 8, the figure “$2,775” is corrected to read “$2,900”.

(2) In line 21, the figure “$2,775” is corrected to read “$2,900”.

7. On page 43586,

a. First column, in the fourth full paragraph,

(1) In line 17, the figure “$345.75” is corrected to read “$340.56”.

(2) In line 21, the figure “$338.84” is corrected to read “$333.75”.

(3) In line 30, the figure “$272.96” is corrected to read “$268.87” and the figure “$345.75” is corrected to read “$340.56”.

(4) In line 33, the figure “$267.51” is corrected to read “$263.49”.

(5) In line 34, the figure “$338.84” is corrected to read “$333.75”.

(6) In line 37, the figure “$138.30” is corrected to read “$133.50” and “$345.75” is corrected to read “$340.56”.

b. Second column, first partial paragraph,

(1) In line 2, the figure “$135.54” is corrected to read “$133.50”.

(2) In line 3, the figure “$338.84” is corrected to read “$333.75”.

(3) In line 6, the figure “$411.26” is corrected to read “$405.09” and “$272.96” is corrected to read “$268.87”.

(4) In line 7, the figure “$138.30” is corrected to read “$136.22”.

(5) In line 9, the figure “$403.05” is corrected to read “$396.99” and “$267.51” is corrected to read “$263.49”.

(6) In line 10, the figure “$135.54” is corrected to read “$133.50”.

c. Third column, under the heading “3. Proposed Calculation of an Adjusted Copayment Amount for an APC Group”, second full paragraph,

(1) In line 6, the figure “$69.15” is corrected to read “$68.12”.

(2) In line 8, the figure “$345.75” is corrected to read “$340.56”.

8. On page 43590, Table 14—New Category III CPT Codes Implemented In July 2013, the fifth column titled, “Proposed CY 2014 Payment Rate” is corrected to read as follows:

Table 14—New Category III CPT Codes Implemented in July 2013 Back to Top
CY 2013 CPT Code CY 2013 Long descriptor Proposed CY 2014 status indicator Proposed CY 2014 APC Proposed CY 2014 payment rate
0329T Monitoring of intraocular pressure for 24 hours or longer, unilateral or bilateral, with interpretation and report E N/A N/A
0330T Tear film imaging, unilateral or bilateral, with interpretation and report S 0230 $51.05
0331T Myocardial sympathetic innervation imaging, planar qualitative and quantitative assessment S 0398 391.36
0332T Myocardial sympathetic innervation imaging, planar qualitative and quantitative assessment; with tomographic SPECT S 0398 391.36
0333T Visual evoked potential, screening of visual acuity, automated E N/A N/A
0334T Sacroiliac joint stabilization for arthrodesis, percutaneous or minimally invasive (indirect visualization), includes obtaining and applying autograft or allograft (structural or morselized), when performed, includes image guidance when performed (that is, CT or fluoroscopic) T 0208 4,108.96

9. On page 43630, Table 34-New Level II HCPCS Codes for Covered Surgical Procedures or Covered Ancillary Services Implemented in July 2013, the table is corrected to read as follows:

Table 34—New Level II HCPCS Codes for Covered Surgical Procedures or Covered Ancillary Services Implemented in July 2013 Back to Top
CY 2013 HCPCS Code CY 2013 Long descriptor Proposed CY 2014 payment indicator Proposed CY 2014 payment rate
* Note: HCPCS code Q2050 replaced code J9002 and HCPCS code Q2051 replaced HCPCS codes J3487 and J3488 beginning July 1, 2013.
C9131 Injection, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, 1 mg K2 $29.40
C9736 Laparoscopy, surgical, radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroid(s), including intraoperative guidance and monitoring, when performed G2 2,010.57
Q2033 Influenza Vaccine, Recombinant Himagglutinin Antigens, for Intramuscular Use (Flublok) L1 N/A
Q2050 * Injection, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Liposomal, Not Otherwise Specified, 10 mg K2 545.44
Q2051 * Injection, Zoledronic Acid, Not Otherwise Specified, 1 mg K2 196.42

10. On page 43631, Table 35-New Category III CPT Codes Implemented in July 2013 as ASC Covered Ancillary Services, the table is corrected to read as follows:

11. On page 43641, first column, first partial paragraph, in line 12, the figure “0.8961” is corrected to read “0.9102”.

12. On page 43652, third column, first partial paragraph,

a. In line 6, the figure “$71.273” is corrected to read “$71.288”.

b. In line 7, the figure “$72.728” is corrected to read “$72.743”.

13. On pages 43692 through 43693, Table 39—Estimated Impact of the Proposed CY 2014 Changes for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System, the table is corrected to read as follows:

Table 39—Estimated Impact of the Proposed CY 2014 Changes for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System Back to Top
Number of hospitals APC recalibration (all changes) (%) New wage index and provider adjustments (%) Combined cols 2,3 with market basket update Column 4 with frontier wage index adjustment (%) All proposed changes (%)
Column (1) shows total hospitals and/or CMHCs.
Column (2) includes all CY 2014 OPPS proposals and compares those to the CY 2013 OPPS (which includes outpatient lab services previously paid at CLFS rates).
Column (3) shows the budget neutral impact of updating the wage index by applying the FY 2014 hospital inpatient wage index. The proposed rural adjustment continues our current policy of 7.1 percent so the budget neutrality factor is 1. Similarly, the differential in estimated cancer hospital payments for the proposed adjustment is minimal and thus results in a budget neutrality factor of 1.0003.
Column (4) shows the impact of all budget neutrality adjustments and the proposed addition of the 1.8 percent OPD fee schedule update factor (2.5 percent reduced by 0.4 percentage points for the proposed productivity adjustment and further reduced by 0.3 percentage point in order to satisfy statutory requirements set forth in the Affordable Care Act).
Column (5) shows the non-budget neutral impact of applying the frontier State wage adjustment.
Column (6) shows the additional adjustments to the conversion factor resulting from a change in the pass-through estimate, adding estimated outlier payments, and applying payment wage indexes.
* These 3,953 providers include children and cancer hospitals, which are held harmless to pre-BBA amounts, and CMHCs. Payments for lab services at CLFS rates, which we are proposing to package in the CY 2014 OPPS, are included in the columns where appropriate.
** Complete DSH numbers are not available for providers that are not paid under IPPS, including rehabilitation, psychiatric, and long-term care hospitals.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
ALL FACILITIES * 3,953 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 1.8
ALL HOSPITALS 3,791 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 1.8
(excludes hospitals permanently held harmless and CMHCs)            
URBAN HOSPITALS 2,859 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.0 1.9
LARGE URBAN (GT 1 MILL.) 1,566 0.3 0.2 2.3 2.3 2.3
OTHER URBAN (LE 1 MILL.) 1,293 −0.3 −0.1 1.4 1.7 1.5
RURAL HOSPITALS 932 −0.3 −0.3 1.3 1.5 1.4
SOLE COMMUNITY 389 0.3 −0.3 1.9 2.3 1.9
OTHER RURAL 543 −0.8 −0.2 0.8 0.9 0.8
BEDS (URBAN)            
0-99 BEDS 959 0.1 0.1 1.9 2.1 2.0
100-199 BEDS 831 −0.2 −0.1 1.5 1.6 1.6
200-299 BEDS 454 −0.4 0.0 1.4 1.6 1.5
300-499 BEDS 407 0.1 0.0 1.9 2.1 2.0
500 + BEDS 208 0.4 0.2 2.4 2.4 2.4
BEDS (RURAL)            
0-49 BEDS 352 −0.7 −0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6
50-100 BEDS 342 0.4 −0.1 2.1 2.4 2.2
101-149 BEDS 133 −0.6 −0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9
150-199 BEDS 61 −1.0 −0.1 0.7 1.1 0.7
200 + BEDS 44 −0.3 −0.2 1.3 1.3 1.5
VOLUME (URBAN)            
LT 5,000 Lines 485 −0.5 0.2 1.5 1.7 1.6
5,000-10,999 Lines 109 0.3 -0.1 1.9 2.4 1.4
11,000-20,999 Lines 132 0.1 0.0 1.9 2.1 1.9
21,000-42,999 Lines 262 −0.1 −0.2 1.5 1.6 1.6
42,999-89,999 Lines 517 0.2 0.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
GT 89,999 Lines 1,354 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.0 1.9
VOLUME (RURAL)            
LT 5,000 Lines 31 0.1 −0.4 1.5 6.1 1.6
5,000-10,999 Lines 34 2.1 −0.5 3.3 3.4 3.4
11,000-20,999 Lines 67 1.8 −0.7 2.8 3.0 2.7
21,000-42,999 Lines 182 0.8 −0.3 2.3 2.9 2.2
GT 42,999 Lines 618 −0.4 −0.2 1.2 1.4 1.3
REGION (URBAN)            
NEW ENGLAND 150 1.1 0.6 3.5 3.5 3.4
MIDDLE ATLANTIC 342 0.2 0.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
SOUTH ATLANTIC 432 −0.5 −0.3 1.0 1.0 1.1
EAST NORTH CENT. 459 −0.1 −0.2 1.5 1.5 1.5
EAST SOUTH CENT. 172 −0.5 −0.3 1.0 1.0 1.1
WEST NORTH CENT. 193 1.7 −0.3 3.1 4.3 3.3
WEST SOUTH CENT. 487 −1.1 −0.2 0.6 0.6 0.7
MOUNTAIN 194 0.5 −0.3 2.0 2.3 2.0
PACIFIC 385 0.3 0.6 2.7 2.7 2.6
PUERTO RICO 45 4.2 0.6 6.6 6.6 7.0
REGION (RURAL)            
NEW ENGLAND 25 2.7 0.6 5.1 5.1 5.0
MIDDLE ATLANTIC 68 −1.3 −0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
SOUTH ATLANTIC 158 −1.0 −0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
EAST NORTH CENT. 124 −0.9 −0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6
EAST SOUTH CENT. 170 −0.9 −0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5
WEST NORTH CENT. 99 1.0 −0.1 2.7 3.9 2.8
WEST SOUTH CENT. 196 −0.7 −0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9
MOUNTAIN 63 0.4 0.2 2.5 4.0 2.0
PACIFIC 29 2.4 0.7 4.9 5.0 5.0
TEACHING STATUS            
NON-TEACHING 2,792 −0.5 −0.1 1.2 1.3 1.3
MINOR 686 −0.2 0.0 1.6 1.9 1.7
MAJOR 313 1.2 0.2 3.2 3.2 3.1
DSH PATIENT PERCENT            
0 12 −1.3 −0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2
GT 0-0.10 349 0.1 0.1 2.0 2.1 2.0
0.10-0.16 334 0.0 0.1 1.9 2.1 2.0
0.16-0.23 680 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.0 1.9
0.23-0.35 1,045 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 1.8
GE 0.35 831 −0.1 0.0 1.7 1.7 1.7
DSH NOT AVAILABLE ** 540 1.7 0.0 3.5 3.5 3.2
URBAN TEACHING/DSH            
TEACHING & DSH 909 0.4 0.1 2.3 2.5 2.3
NO TEACHING/DSH 1,429 −0.6 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.3
NO TEACHING/NO DSH 12 −1.3 −0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2
DSH NOT AVAILABLE ** 509 1.6 0.1 3.5 3.6 3.2
TYPE OF OWNERSHIP            
VOLUNTARY 2,004 0.1 0.1 2.0 2.2 2.1
PROPRIETARY 1,250 −0.5 −0.1 1.2 1.3 1.2
GOVERNMENT 537 −0.3 −0.2 1.3 1.3 1.4
CMHCs 100 −7.1 −0.2 −5.6 −5.5 −5.2

14. On page 43696,

a. First column, first full paragraph, in line 9, the figure “0.8961” is corrected to read “0.9102”.

b. Third column,

(1) Fourth paragraph, in line 8, the phrase “a 1 percent increase” is corrected to read “no change”.

(2) Fifth paragraph, in line 13, the phrase “7 percent” is corrected to read “8 percent”.

15. On page 43697, Table 40—Estimated Impact of the Proposed CY 2014 Update to the ASC Payment System on Aggregate CY 2014 Medicare Program Payments by Surgical Specialty or Ancillary Items and Services Group, the table is corrected to read as follows:

16. On pages 43697 through 43698, Table 41—Estimated Impact of the Proposed CY 2014 Update to the ASC Payment System on Aggregate Payments for Selected Procedures, the table is corrected to read as follows:

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program); (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

Dated: September 4, 2013.

Jennifer M. Cannistra,

Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. 2013-21849 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P

View original: Federal Register | Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Hospital …